Sunday, September 13, 2009

Reviewer: Wayne O Wright

Prabaharan Poornachandran, Alexander Peter, Wayne O Wright: "Enterprise Architecture: Internet and Distributed Application," SU-IEEE, CIS512005016:05,2009
Posted by at

1 comment:

  1. wowrightSeptember 17, 2009 at 9:50 AM

    1. Were the basic sections (Introduction, Conclusion, Cited, etc.) adequate? If not, what is missing?
    Yes the sections were included in Prabaharan's paper.

    2. Did the writer use subheadings well to clarify the sections of the text? Explain.
    Yes, Prabaharan used subheadings to easily organize the different sections of the paper.

    3. Was the material ordered in a way that was logical, clear, easy to follow? Explain.
    Yes, Prabaharan organized the data in an easy-flowing pattern that flowed in a way that built upon the material that preceded it.

    4. Rate the paper on Assertion: clarity, importance: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak).
    Prabaharan's paper was strong. He introduced the information, then supplied follow-on supporting information to bring about further clarity.

    5. Rate the paper on Evidence: relevance, strength, credibility: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak).
    I rate Prabaharan's paper as strong. All information was supported from valid sources.

    6. Rate the paper on Organization: arrangement of ideas, guiding the reader: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak).
    I rated Prabaharan's paper as strong.

    7. Rate the paper on Mechanics: spelling, grammar, punctuation: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak)
    I also give Prabaharan a strong rating in this section. The only area that I saw needing consistency was most of the paper was "full justified" but there were a few sections that were "left justified".

    8. Overall effectiveness: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak) and explaing why?
    Overall, I rate Prabaharan's paper as Strong. He clearly put in the time and effort to write a paper that was backed by facts and put together very well.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)