Sunday, September 13, 2009

Reviewer: Pankaj Patel:

Andrew Mazzola, Alexander Peter, Pankaj Patel:"Enterprise Architecture: Lossless Compression," SU-IEEE, CIS532005016:05,2009
Posted by at

1 comment:

  1. phpatel44September 16, 2009 at 10:09 PM

    1.Were the basic sections (Introduction, Conclusion, Cited, etc.) adequate? If not, what is missing?
    Yes, the basic sections where there.

    2.Did the writer use subheadings well to clarify the sections of the text? Explain.
    Yes, The paper was formatted properly.

    3.Was the material ordered in a way that was logical, clear, easy to follow? Explain.
    Yes ,The material was ordered in a way logical and clear and easy to understand up to point.
    4.Rate the paper on Assertion: clarity, importance: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak).
    Satisfactory on both

    5.Rate the paper on Evidence: relevance, strength, credibility: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak).
    Each was satisfactory

    6.Rate the paper on Organization: arrangement of ideas, guiding the reader: (Strong, Satisfactory,
    Weak).
    Strong on all
    7.Rate the paper on Mechanics: spelling, grammar, punctuation: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak)
    satisfactory

    8.Overall effectiveness: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak) and explaing why?
    The overall effectiveness of this paper is satisfactory . The starting of paper is very good .All section of paper are clear and easy to understand.Language of paper is very clear and effective .Some of the sections of paper require detail explanation.overall paper is satisfactory

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)