Sunday, September 13, 2009

Reviewer: Shany Thompson

Jacques Stover, Alexander Peter, Shany’e R. Thompson: "Enterprise Architecture: Understanding Computer Networks," SU-IEEE, CIS512005016:05,2009
Posted by at

1 comment:

  1. S. ThompsonSeptember 19, 2009 at 12:19 PM

    1. Were the basic sections (Introduction, Conclusion, Cited, etc.) adequate? If not, what is missing? Yes! Everything was adequate in this paper. He had all the important sections that needed to be in a paper. For instance, abstract, introduction, bodies, conclusion, references, and etc.

    2. Did the writer use subheadings well to clarify the sections of the text? Explain. Yes! The reader used subheadings well to clarify the section in the paper. The reader uses the important factors in the chapter of the book as the subheadings of each section in the paper. For example, OSI model, TCP/IP Model, Results, and etc.

    3. Was the material ordered in a way that was logical, clear, easy to follow? Explain. Yes! The material is ordered in the paper the way that is logical, clear, and easy to follow. For instance, the paper gives the topic, explains the topic, and then gives a visual diagram of the topic. Basically one reads what is given, then to get a more clearly understanding the paper gives a visual picture.

    4. Rate the paper on Assertion: clarity, importance: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak). The paper is very Strong on assertion. It has all the important factors in reference to computer networking.

    5. Rate the paper on Evidence: relevance, strength, credibility: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak). The paper is Satisfactory on evidence. The reader was looking for more subheadings because the chapter has much more information than this. However, the reader understands that the professor wanted a summary.

    6. Rate the paper on Organization: arrangement of ideas, guiding the reader: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak). The organization of the paper is Strong. Correct font, with all the correct sections and subheadings.

    7. Rate the paper on Mechanics: spelling, grammar, punctuation: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak) The paper is very Strong on mechanics. The spelling, grammar, and punctuation were good in the paper. The words, sentences, and etc. are very understanding.

    8. Overall effectiveness: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak) and explain why? The overall effectiveness of this paper is Strong. It has all the sections to a paper, visual diagrams, and it’s a clear summary of the chapter which gives the reader a clear understanding of computer networking.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)