Sunday, September 13, 2009

Reviewer: Regina Beres

Sawetrattanaroj:"IEEE and ISO model," SU-IEEE, CIS532005016:05,2009
Posted by at

1 comment:

  1. CalvinSeptember 20, 2009 at 7:23 PM

    1. Were the basic sections (Introduction, Conclusion, Cited, etc.) adequate? If not, what is missing?
    Yes
    2. Did the writer use subheadings well to clarify the sections of the text? Explain.
    Yes, the subheadings gave me an idea of what the user would be talking about.
    3. Was the material ordered in a way that was logical, clear, easy to follow? Explain.
    Yes, the information was in a logical order that made the paper easy to read and understand what the writer was trying to say.
    4. Rate the paper on Assertion: clarity, importance: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak).
    Strong
    5. Rate the paper on Evidence: relevance, strength, credibility: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak).
    Strong
    6. Rate the paper on Organization: arrangement of ideas, guiding the reader: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak).
    Strong
    7. Rate the paper on Mechanics: spelling, grammar, punctuation: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak)
    Satisfactory
    8. Overall effectiveness: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak) and explaing why?

    Strong, I thought the paper was well written and explained the network layers very well

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)