The basic sections were more than adequate, I thought well put together. The writer used subheadings very well to clarify the subject matter of the sections of the text. The order of the material was logical and easy to follow. In my opinion, the assertion of the paper was very strong. The paper should diagrams and illustrations, as well as fact to back up the evidence. This I thought was strong. The organization of the paper was strong. The mechanics of the paper was strong, with the exception of the three extra blank pages at the end of the document. I would think that the overall effectiveness of the paper is strong due to all of the paper's strong characteristics, aside from the extra blank pages, considering it was more or less a guide of the Ethernet from A to Z in summary form. Great paper. Well done!
George Mitchell, Network Architecture and Analysis Ethernet
1. Basic Actions - George included the necessary sections to his research paper. 2. Subheadings - To me it was hard to follow because I his subheadings weren't bold enough to know what section ws next and what was to come. 3. Material order - The paper itself was in material order and very logical. 4. Assertion - Strong 5. Evidence - Strong 6. Organization - Satisfactory 7. Mechanics - Strong 8. Overall effectiveness - Overall the paper was enjoyable to read and very informative. Great job!
The basic sections were more than adequate, I thought well put together. The writer used subheadings very well to clarify the subject matter of the sections of the text. The order of the material was logical and easy to follow. In my opinion, the assertion of the paper was very strong. The paper should diagrams and illustrations, as well as fact to back up the evidence. This I thought was strong. The organization of the paper was strong. The mechanics of the paper was strong, with the exception of the three extra blank pages at the end of the document. I would think that the overall effectiveness of the paper is strong due to all of the paper's strong characteristics, aside from the extra blank pages, considering it was more or less a guide of the Ethernet from A to Z in summary form. Great paper. Well done!
ReplyDeleteGeorge Mitchell, Network Architecture and Analysis Ethernet
ReplyDelete1. Basic Actions - George included the necessary sections to his research paper.
2. Subheadings - To me it was hard to follow because I his subheadings weren't bold enough to know what section ws next and what was to come.
3. Material order - The paper itself was in material order and very logical.
4. Assertion - Strong
5. Evidence - Strong
6. Organization - Satisfactory
7. Mechanics - Strong
8. Overall effectiveness - Overall the paper was enjoyable to read and very informative. Great job!
April Renetta Rhodes