Sunday, September 13, 2009

Reviewer: Jacques Stover

Shany Thompson, Alexander Peter, Jacques Stover: "Computer Networks," SU-IEEE, CIS512005016:05,2009
Posted by at

1 comment:

  1. AnonymousSeptember 17, 2009 at 6:48 PM

    1. Were the basic sections (Introduction, Conclusion, Cited, etc.) adequate? If not, what is missing?

    Sections within paper were adequately outlined to include Introduction, Conclusion and Reference materials cited appropriately.

    2. Did the writer use subheadings well to clarify the sections of the text? Explain.

    Information contained within each section was very representative of the information discussed.

    3. Was the material ordered in a way that was logical, clear, easy to follow? Explain.

    Information contained in Computer Networks research paper contained very comprehensive information which explained network components, physical and logical layout and rules in place which make network communication possible.

    4. Rate the paper on Assertion: clarity, importance: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak).

    Overall assertion rating of Satisfactory given to this research paper

    5. Rate the paper on Evidence: relevance, strength, credibility: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak).

    In the area of relevance, strength and credibility a rating of Satisfactory is assessed.

    6. Rate the paper on Organization: arrangement of ideas, guiding the reader: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak).

    The assembly of information contained in the Computer Networks research paper is rated Strong.

    7. Rate the paper on Mechanics: spelling, grammar, punctuation: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak)

    The Mechanics of the research paper as it relates to spelling, grammar and punctuation is Satisfactory.

    8. Overall effectiveness: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak) and explaining why?

    Overall effectiveness of the content of the information outlined in the Computer Networks research paper is rated Satisfactory.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)