Tuesday, September 15, 2009

Reviewer: April Stewart

Robin Cole, Alexander Peter, April Stewart:"Data Storage Technology," SU-IEEE, CIS512005016:05,2009
Posted by at

1 comment:

  1. nwknjgirlSeptember 19, 2009 at 4:13 PM

    1. Were the basic sections (Introduction, Conclusion, Cited, etc.) adequate? If not, what is missing?

    The basic sections were covered except for the summary. The abstract needed to be explained a little more about the purpose of the paper. You would want to write it as if no one has ever heard of Data Storage Technology. I see the summary of the paper was listed however not included in the paper.

    2. Did the writer use subheadings well to clarify the sections of the text? Explain.

    The subheadings in this report were used accurately; they let you know what the next section was about.

    3. Was the material ordered in a way that was logical, clear, and easy to follow? Explain.

    The report was informative and straight forward.

    4. Rate the paper on Assertion: clarity, importance: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak).

    The assertion of the paper was satisfactory.

    5. Rate the paper on Evidence: relevance, strength, credibility: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak).

    I believe the evidence was satisfactory. It could have been better if more references were used.

    6. Rate the paper on Organization: arrangement of ideas, guiding the reader: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak).

    The arrangement was satisfactory, but could have been strong if the abstract had enough information in it and then the paper could have followed the abstract.

    7. Rate the paper on Mechanics: spelling, grammar, punctuation: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak)

    The mechanics of the paper were done satisfactory.

    8. Overall effectiveness: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak) and explain why?

    The overall presentation was satisfactory. The subject was easily explained but if the paper had more illustrations in it and a summery was needed.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)