Friday, September 11, 2009

Reviewer: Calvin J Johnson III

Calvin J Johnson III; Alexander Peter: "Introduction to System Architecture,” SU-IEEE, CIS512005016:05,2009

1 comment:

  1. 1. Were the basic sections (Introduction, Conclusion, Cited, etc.) adequate? If not, what is missing?

    The basic sections were covered. I believe a abstract could have been used also.

    2. Did the writer use subheadings well to clarify the sections of the text? Explain.

    The subheadings in this report were used accurately; they let you know what the next section was about.

    3. Was the material ordered in a way that was logical, clear, and easy to follow? Explain.

    The paper was easy to follow. I like the cover page that was done.

    4. Rate the paper on Assertion: clarity, importance: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak).

    The assertion of the paper was strong.

    5. Rate the paper on Evidence: relevance, strength, credibility: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak).

    I believe the evidence was strong. I like that more than one reference was used.

    6. Rate the paper on Organization: arrangement of ideas, guiding the reader: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak).

    The arrangement was strong. I also like the images that were used inside the paper.

    7. Rate the paper on Mechanics: spelling, grammar, punctuation: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak)

    The mechanics of the paper was done very well.

    8. Overall effectiveness: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak) and explain why?

    The overall presentation was strong. The subject was easily understood. The paper also looks as if the writer was able to format the paper in IEEE format and not just used a template. Very good.

    ReplyDelete