1) Were the basic sections (Introduction, Conclusion, Cited, etc.) adequate? If not, what is missing? The basic sections were adequate. However, it would be good if the conclusion of the topic was present. 2) Did the writer use subheadings well to clarify the sections of the text? Explain. The document was broken into different sections but it was hard to follow. The subheadings if used would make the paper more precise and easy to follow. 3) Was the material ordered in a way that was logical, clear, and easy to follow? Explain. The material of the paper was arranged very clearly. The paper gave a clear understanding of the topic. 4) Rate the paper on Assertion: clarity, importance: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak). I rate the paper on importance and clarity as strong. All the points related to the topic were presented very clearly. 5) Rate the paper on Evidence: relevance, strength, credibility: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak). I rate the paper as strong. The writer has given many references to prove her point. 6) Rate the paper on Organization: arrangement of ideas, guiding the reader: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak). I rate the paper as strong. It was very clear and easily guided. It was very easy to move from one point to the other from the paper. 7) Rate the paper on Mechanics: spelling, grammar, punctuation: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak) Strong because there were no misspellings or punctuation errors. 8) Overall effectiveness: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak) and explain why? Overall effectiveness of the paper can be rated as Strong. The overall paper was organized very effectively and guided the reader to have a clear understanding of the topic.
1) Were the basic sections (Introduction, Conclusion, Cited, etc.) adequate? If not, what is missing?
ReplyDeleteThe basic sections were adequate. However, it would be good if the conclusion of the topic was present.
2) Did the writer use subheadings well to clarify the sections of the text? Explain.
The document was broken into different sections but it was hard to follow. The subheadings if used would make the paper more precise and easy to follow.
3) Was the material ordered in a way that was logical, clear, and easy to follow? Explain.
The material of the paper was arranged very clearly. The paper gave a clear understanding of the topic.
4) Rate the paper on Assertion: clarity, importance: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak).
I rate the paper on importance and clarity as strong. All the points related to the topic were presented very clearly.
5) Rate the paper on Evidence: relevance, strength, credibility: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak).
I rate the paper as strong. The writer has given many references to prove her point.
6) Rate the paper on Organization: arrangement of ideas, guiding the reader: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak).
I rate the paper as strong. It was very clear and easily guided. It was very easy to move from one point to the other from the paper.
7) Rate the paper on Mechanics: spelling, grammar, punctuation: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak)
Strong because there were no misspellings or punctuation errors.
8) Overall effectiveness: (Strong, Satisfactory, Weak) and explain why?
Overall effectiveness of the paper can be rated as Strong. The overall paper was organized very effectively and guided the reader to have a clear understanding of the topic.