Saturday, June 20, 2009

Reviewer: Ethan Provensen

TaRhea Haynes; Alexander Peter: "Introduction to System Architecture,” SU-IEE E, CIS512005016:04,2009

1 comment:

  1. 1. Everything was very well written and the basic sections were very adequate. I did not see anything missing. Great job.

    2. You did a very good job using your subheadings. Every passage or paragraph had to do with the subheading. Your paper had a very nice flow.

    3. The material was positioned or ordered in a clear way that it was logical and easy to follow. Again you did not go off course, and stuck with the topic of your paper. Very nice.

    4. In regards to assertion, I would rate this paper to be a satisfactory paper. You mentioned the important facts, and you were clear and to the point.

    5. In regards to evidence I would rate this paper as strong. You cleary stated out facts and reasons why those facts were true. It was a good and solid strong paper. And you showed credibility.

    6. In regards to organization, I would rate this paper strong. You did an excellent job of organizing your seperate headings, sub-headings, and so forth. I clearly saw your arrangment of ideas, and you guided me with the facts that I was seeking.

    7. Thank god for MS Word. In regards to mechanics I would rate your paper as satisfactory. Overall in the body of your paper everything looked good. All of your spelling and punctation looked correct, and for the most part all of your punctuation looked correct. I just did not see a running header.

    8. In regards to overall effectiveness, I would rate this paper as a strong research paper. You did an excellent job and sticked with the topic very well. You should be proud of your accomplishment.

    ReplyDelete